Should they be allowed to marry? Thus not some but all of the passages relating to same-gender sexual intercourse are categorically against it.
Is it Scriptural to argue that a homosexual orientation is morally neutral and hence, not a sin but the action itself is that which is sinful? Noel Weeks states it well: In fact the recent government proposals are only for the legalisation of civil same-sex marriage, and do not allow for ceremonies to be conducted on religious sites.
His written Word is the surest and most trustworthy guide for every human thought and conduct 2 Tim 3: The bottom line is that he needs a life guard, a savior. Marriage is not the creature of any State.
Adding such a requirement for the right to marry now is both unfair and would have serious legal ramifications. Personally, I have always found the idea of gay marriage attacking the sanctity of marriage to be an amusing concept, particularly considering many of the champions of such attacks. Whenever somebody makes the argument that marriage equality harms straight marriage, you should challenge them to tell you exactly how.
Fortunately, the general trajectory of recent federal laws is towards greater equality, but we still have a good way to go before full equality is realized. As I have previously mentioned, there is no compelling governmental interest that would justify the government interfering in the personal sex lives of gay Americans.
It forces us to answer the question of whether the transforming power of God is more effective than the impotent power of psychological therapy. The laws of society and the Bible must change to accommodate the homosexual who, once gay, will always be gay.
I support gay equality for three simple reasons: But the first step in receiving forgiveness is to recognize our wrongdoing as sin.
Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. Is sexual conduct less personal than political expression? Let religions keep their ideas of sin in-house, leaving secular logic to decide secular law.
Th e Argument from Health I am persuaded that we should be disapproving of homosexual behavior for health reasons as well. This was confirmed in Lawrence v. The belief in evolution is inconsistent with a belief in the equality of homosexuality to heterosexuality.
In essence, having a two-class system continues to maintain the erroneous notion that one group straight people is more superior to another group LGBT people.
Are we afraid of homosexuals? It also omits from history the married gay couples of ancient China and Rome, Mormon polygamy, and the ancient Egyptians who could marry their sisters.
It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception.
An Introduction and Commentary Downers Grove: I have been told my natural urges are a choice. Is this an autobiographical note? This is why they prefer to see their homosexual orientation as normal, natural, morally neutral, and a gift from God. W hat it Means For Christians to be Opposed to Homosexuality Before I address the societal reasons Christians object to homosexuality I wish to make it clear as to what the Christian position is pertaining to how we believe homosexual individuals ought to be treated in society.So, in sum, the “naturalness” argument against the moral neutrality of homosexual behavior is a big, wet, steaming crock of a well-known natural fertilizer.
1k Views · View Upvoters Quora User, studies Medicine and Healthcare at University of. The most common and popular arguments against gay marriage, mostly religious in nature, are easy to refute because they're based on serious errors.
a result of human desire which is supported by the community as a whole. For this reason, The most simplistic argument against gay marriage is to look at a dictionary.
Many choose to. The 3 Arguments Against Gay Marriage That May Decide It Once and for All. Anti–Gay Marriage Argument No.
1: the 14th Amendment and its Equal Protection Clause are intended to protect vulnerable minorities such as the LGBT community from discrimination, according to Lambda Legal’s Davidson.
Arguing Against Homosexuality: A Respon se to Challenges. by Jason Dulle. An Argument Against Homosexuality. from the evolutionary perspective I fail to see how one could not conclude that the homosexual community is evolutionary inferior to the heterosexual community. Because homosexuals cannot produce offspring they cannot.
The homosexual community rages against the failures of normal marriage yet seem to want that exact same right themselves. Confusing to say the least. But more disturbing is the rights of the children that will be completely trodden underfoot if.
Fighting Against Violence in the LGBT Community. Introduction Violence against the LGBT community is a horrific and inhuman reality.Download